The Law Of Mines Quarries And Minerals Classic Reprint

Excerpt from The Law of Mines, Quarries, and Minerals The latter case is also the latest authority for the statement, that, in order to exclude the right of support, the intention must be shown, either by express words, or by necessary implication. Aspden v. Seddon (which came before the Court of Appeal in 1875) is one of the few cases (if not the only case) in which the defence of necessary implication has succeeded; and it is perhaps doubtful, whether, in the face of the rule of construction next mentioned, that case is still an authority. The public spirit of litigants may be trusted in the future (as in the past) to endeavour to find examples of what is necessary implication, and to succeed in finding examples of what is not. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.