Illustrative Cases On Equity Jurisprudence Classic Reprint

Excerpt from Illustrative Cases on Equity Jurisprudence The bill protests against another clause of the said deed of mortgage, as being not only manifestly against his rights, but in direct violation of the deed from said Walk er to complainant's predecessor; alleges that the land in the deed is estimated at that indebtedness in the mortgage is 64, far less than the value of the land; charges that, since the execution of the mortgage, said William F. Has 1 rid or $2 000 to Carlisle Humphries, which should have been credited on said indebted ness, and that the mortgage provides that the surplus from the land sale shall be paid to Walker and wife, and not to the trustee, the complainant. The bill further states that said Humph ries Carlisle, by their agent and attorney, J. N. Carlisle, Esq., have advertised the lands for sale under the mortgage, and also about bushels of corn, on the second Monday in March, 1868. A copy of the advertise ment is filed as an exhibit. II. G. Humphries, E. K. Carlisle, J. N. Carlisle, and William F. Walker are made defendants, and injunction, etc., prayed for to restrain the sale. There is also a prayer for discovery, by Humphries Carlisle, of the amount due them, and that on final hear ing the injunction be made perpetual, that the mortgage be canceled. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.